In every company where Oxobox hasn’t yet arrived, there’s always one king: Excel. Every department builds its own spreadsheet. Planning, operations, acquisitions, finance—each team talks about the same assets, but focuses on different columns of information.

• Planning teams care about delivery dates and scheduling.

• Operations manage technical details, QC tasks, and file versions.

• Finance looks at results and billing, not the granular process.

• Project Managers need anomaly detection and a high-level overview.

• Media experts want detailed asset-level control with workflow metadata.

In other words, the same data must be seen through different lenses.

That insight shaped how we built Oxobox. We realized that to succeed, we had to embrace Excel both as an input and an output:

• Users can build custom views and filters directly in Oxobox—powerful enough to reflect the “wisdom of the working community.”

• Those views can be exported as Excel reports, perfect for audits, management, or sharing outside the platform.

• Conversely, teams can also ingest Excel task lists created during pre-production, transforming them into live, traceable workflows inside Oxobox.

This flexibility ensures that every team sees exactly what matters to them—while still speaking the same language across the supply chain. No more conflicting spreadsheets, no more manual reconciliations. Just one source of truth, expressed in the format each role understands best.

The strategic advantage is clear:

• Customization: every user adapts views to their needs without losing consistency.

• Interoperability: seamless Excel import/export keeps Oxobox in sync with existing workflows.

• Collaboration: operations, planning, acquisitions, and finance can finally align on the same asset universe.

Watch the video to see how Oxobox bridges the gap between Excel and enterprise workflows, giving every stakeholder clarity and control.